Hengstenberg shows that where this verb ( λογίζεσθε) elsewhere occurs, it is used intransitively, and with this Godet agrees then they take ὅτι, as "because" or for it is expedient for you (the text ὑμῖν is preferred by Meyer, Godet, Westcott and Herr, and the Revised. Nor consider or, nor do ye take account. Nor reason that it is good for us that one man may die for the people, and not the whole nation perish.' Nor do you consider that it is advantageous for us that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish.” You do not reflect that it is to your interest that one man should die for the people rather than the whole nation perish." Nor do you consider that it is advantageous for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish." You do not understand that it is better for you to have one man die for the people than to have the whole nation destroyed.” You do not realize that it is more to your advantage to have one man die for the people than for the whole nation to perish." Nor do you consider that it is better for you that one man should die instead of the people, so that the whole nation may not perish.” You do not realize that it is better for us that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish.” Nor reason that it is good for us that one man may die for the people, and not the whole nation perish.” You don't realize that it is better for you to have one man die for the people than to have the whole nation destroyed." You haven't even considered this: It is better for one man to die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed."ĭon't you realize that it is better for you to have one man die for the people, instead of having the whole nation destroyed?" Neither do you consider that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not. “And you do not consider that is profitable for us that one man should die instead of the nation, and not that the whole nation perish.”ĭon't you know it is better for one person to die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed?" Nor do ye take account that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not. You’re not considering that it is to your advantage that one man should die for the people rather than the whole nation perish.” Nor do you understand that it is expedient and politically advantageous for you that one man die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish.” Nor do you take into account that it is better for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish.” Nor do you take into account that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation should not perish.” Nor do you take into account that it is expedient for you that one man die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish.” Nor are you taking into account that it is in your best interest that one man die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish instead.” Nor do you consider that it is expedient for us that one man should die for the people, and not that the whole nation should perish.” Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not. Nor do you consider that it is profitable for you that one man should die for the people, and the whole nation should not perish." Nor do you understand that it is better for you that one man should die for the people, not that the whole nation should perish.” You don’t realize that it’s better for you that one man should die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed.” You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |